Evidence, sources and context — ready to interrogate.
A professional gateway for journalists, researchers, producers and publishers who need concise background, traceable sources and clear distinctions between claims, signals and established evidence.
Media enquiries
Request background material, source trails, clarification of an article or comment on the evidence covered by the site.
Send a media enquiryResearch enquiries
Ask about source selection, archive entries, claim histories or the methodology used in an evidence explainer.
Read our standardsLicensing & syndication
Selected explainers, graphics and evidence briefs may be available for republication or licensing by agreement. Third-party material is excluded unless separately licensed.
Discuss licensingCorrections & right of reply
If you identify a significant factual error, send the page, disputed statement and supporting evidence. Material corrections should be made promptly and visibly.
Submit a correctionQuick-reference source packs
Core conclusion, evidence trail and links to the full explainer.
What spontaneous reports can — and cannot — establish.
Effectiveness, common side effects and safety-review context.
Trials, post-authorisation surveillance, signals and regulatory action.
How to cite ANTIVAX.co.uk
For web citation, include the article title, ANTIVAX.co.uk, the page URL and your access date. Where our page points to a primary source, researchers should normally cite the underlying primary source directly rather than treating our explainer as a substitute.
Suggested format:
“Article title”, ANTIVAX.co.uk, reviewed/published date where shown, accessed [date].
Editorial independence
Commercial relationships should not determine evidence conclusions. Sponsored or licensed material should be identified clearly, and editorial claims should remain subject to the same sourcing and correction standards.